Skip to main content

Op-Ed video: Why the West got the Turkey elections all wrong

US and European news outlets peddled the narrative that it was 'impossible' for Erdogan to perform well in the first round. David Hearst breaks down why they got it so wrong
</div> " class="video-embed-field-lazy container-element">

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan proved his naysayers wrong in the first round of the Turkey elections and is quietly confident about his chances of securing a third term, argues David Hearst, the co-founder and editor-in-chief of Middle East Eye.

Erdogan received 49.40 percent of the votes, just short of an outright victory, while his main competitor, Kemal Kilicdaroglu of the centre-left Republican People’s Party (CHP), could only muster 44.96 percent.  

Kilicdaroglu, a 74-year-old nationalist who was at one point likened to Gandhi, had promoted himself as an inclusive, consensus-seeking negotiator who would lead Turkey into a post-authoritarian age.

But just days after his first-round loss, he abandoned his heart emojis and took aim at the most vulnerable people in the country: 3.6 million Syrian refugees.

The opposition leader is seeking to harness the support of ultra-nationalists before the run-off election, with refugees serving as scapegoats, says Hearst.

Stay informed with MEE's newsletters

Sign up to get the latest alerts, insights and analysis, starting with Turkey Unpacked

 

"So how did everyone who predicted Erdogan's demise get this all wrong," Hearst asks.

"I think they [the media] believed what they wished to believe and forgot that in moments of crisis - like coup attempts and close, hard-fought elections - Erdogan is at his best," he said.

"All western governments and journalists wanted him gone because he emerged as the region's most effective operator. Their objection to him had nothing to do with democracy or human rights," he added.

"And this election, with a first-round turnout of over 90 percent, showed that whatever the many failings of the election system, Turks believe in the elections that they participate in [and] this is a hard pill for the West to swallow; but swallow it they must," he added.

David Hearst is co-founder and editor-in-chief of Middle East Eye. He is a commentator and speaker on the region and analyst on Saudi Arabia. He was the Guardian's foreign leader writer, and was correspondent in Russia, Europe, and Belfast. He joined the Guardian from The Scotsman, where he was education correspondent.
Middle East Eye delivers independent and unrivalled coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and beyond. To learn more about republishing this content and the associated fees, please fill out this form. More about MEE can be found here.